LOG-IN
Displaying reports 2781-2800 of 3128.Go to page Start 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 End
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
DaisukeTatsumi - 15:23, Monday 13 February 2017 (373)Get code to link to this report
Vacuum compatible adhesive: MasterBond EP30-2

I confirmed that a set of MasterBond EP30-2 is storaged in desiccator (dehumidified storage shelf).

Images attached to this report
373_20170213103455_desiccator.jpg 373_20170213103510_masterbondep302.jpg
KAGRA AOS (General)
Print this report.
SimonZeidler - 19:03, Friday 10 February 2017 (372)Get code to link to this report
Repair of JASMINE scatterometer

I started repairing the scatterometer in the JASMINE lab today.

Before doing the actual setup of the new laser, I cleaned up the desk and put the PC, the lock-in, and the motor-power supply on the desk beside the optical table. This gives now much more space to anybody working there.

I also tested the switch-box that has been build by Tanioka-san with the new laser. So far, everything works well.

KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
ManuelMarchio - 00:08, Friday 10 February 2017 (371)Get code to link to this report
Improved assembly of translation stage

I added some aluminum beams, bought from Misumi company, to increase the rigidity of the translation stage

Images attached to this report
371_20170209160727_misumibeams.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 17:20, Thursday 09 February 2017 (370)Get code to link to this report
The picture of the resonance peak while power changing
According to Aso-san's advice that the asymmetric may be caused by the laser power heat up the cavity when it nears to resonance leading to the increase of the cavity length, so it takes longer time to reach the maximum, I tried to see the resonance peak at different input power, the four pictures are took at laser power about: 2W, 1.5W, 1W and 0.5W.(When the laser power is 2W, the input power of the cavity is 820mW). It seems a little bit better with lower power.
Images attached to this report
370_20170209091335_p2090247.jpg 370_20170209091345_p2090249.jpg 370_20170209091356_p2090250.jpg 370_20170209091408_p2090251.jpg
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 17:46, Monday 06 February 2017 (369)Get code to link to this report
Some pictures for better understanding
The first picture shows the shape of the green beam when the cavity is locked at the right temperature.

For the second picture, I tried to scan the cavity with pretty small amplitude triangle wave, and then change the PZT driver by hand to get near to the resonance.

From the picture, there are two problems:

The first one is the what I described before, the slopes from two side of the peak is different, take the first peak as an example, the reduce process is faster than the increase part.

The second is that the two different peaks are actually the same mode but they did not look the same. I discussed with Manuel and we thought it maybe because of the hysteresis, there are some loss in the PZT.
Images attached to this report
369_20170206082311_p2060243.jpg 369_20170206082328_p2060246.jpg
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 19:29, Thursday 02 February 2017 (368)Get code to link to this report
Description of the problem now
There are a few problems with the locking now:

1.The power of the TEM00 transmission drops suddenly

When we try to scan the cavity by changing the output voltage of PZT driver by hands slowly, we can observe the slowly increasing part of the TEM00 power both in the PD and CCD, but then when it reaches its maximum(or near) it drops suddenly. On the oscilloscope connected to the PD, we can see that the power suddenly drop from several tens of mV to several mV, and from the CCD, the diameter of the beam and also the brightness suddenly get smaller.

When I try to lock the cavity, I did as what I will describe below, which I am not sure it's the right way or not. The power of the TEM00 will change from weak to strong and go back to weak when I scan the cavity, which means there is a range of the voltage that gives to the PZT, like from 15V to 17V, I tried to lock the cavity at different voltage. If I chose to lock the cavity at the maximum power, the lock will last for less than 5 mins, and from the CCD I can see it get weaker and move to next modes. And if I locked the cavity at the range where the power is slowly increasing, the lock will last longer, like more than one hour, but the power still slowly increase to the maximum and start to reduce, finally it moves to the same 'next' modes as in last situation. And if I start in the 'suddenly drop' range, it seems much more stable then the other situations, I wait for more than one hour, the power increase to some point at the first beginning then it stops there and does not have any obvious change after. I am not very clear about what this means, and I am also not sure about this result can be repeated since I tried the last situation only once. So maybe if it has some meaning,I can try to do it tomorrow again.

2.The strange shape of the green beam

If we look at the green beam when the cavity is locked(the green is much more powerful and easy to see the detail)and the temperature is at the 'good' temperature, the beam is not a spot, there are many irregular dark lines in it which cut the green like into many strange shape pieces. At the beginning of this week, when we see the green light under room temperature, it almost a spot with a circle which is caused by the Laguerre mode. But now even when we turn the temperature back to the room temperature, it is not as good as what we saw before, but because it's very weak so we can not see it very clearly what exactly the pattern is.

3.The TEM00 is 20 times less in cavity-locking compare to mode-matching-finding and the error signal is only several mV

In my Tuesday logbook entry I gave the picture how I lock the cavity, the PD is connected to the 'RF' port of the demodulation board and also the CH1 of oscilloscope. Also in this picture, from the small picture of the oscilloscope screen,(the yellow is from the PD), it shows that the magnitude of TEM00 (the highest peak of the CH1) is about 50mV. But when we did the mode matching(CH1: PD, CH2: the triangle wave), the TEM00 is more than 1V. Then we found out if disconnect the demodulation board 'RF' port and the PD, the TEM00 goes back to it used to be (>1V). It may caused by the input resistance of the demodulation board,so I will check the PD output resistance and the demodulation board input resistance, to make sure this problem is caused by them or not.

4. The output voltage of the PZT driver does not change

When the loop is closed, if there is some fluctuation, then the feedback should work and the PZT driver will give out the voltage to push or pull the PZT, make it back to the resonance. And in my situation there is a screen on the PZT driver shows the output voltage of it, but it does not change during any lock process until now. My guess is the error signal is too small (couple of mV), the magnification of the PZT driver is 30 times, so even after the signal is amplified, it's couple of tens mV, which cannot show on the display of PZT driver whose digit limit is 0.1V.

I will check the following things later:

1. The properties of the PD and the demodulation board (resistances, the cutting frequency of low pass filter on the demodulation board)

2. Which PD we used in last locking with Matteo

3. The properties of the dichroic mirror, since it should be reflect infrared and transmit green, and now the reflection green beam is really powerful.

4. The exact power sent to the cavity when using the maximum output of the laser

5. The polarization we are using now
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 20:09, Wednesday 01 February 2017 (367)Get code to link to this report
Two questions in locking
As what I showed in yesterday's report, through the CCD camera I can see the mode shape and power while I changed the output voltage of the PZT driver. So today I try to lock the cavity with different power, and found out if lock the cavity with the maximum of the TEM00 mode, I will lose the lock very soon, like in 5-10 mins. If I set the start point at some point near the maximum, the cavity will lock for longer period.

But it seems if I call the two modes near TEM00 as the previous mode and the next mode, the unlock always happened when the TEM00 move to the next mode, I think this means the PZT only let the mirror goes to one direction but I am not sure.

The other problems, the screen on the PZT driver shows the voltage it gives to the PZT, but during the lock process, it does not change. I think it is strange, because when there is fluctuation and the PZT will move to recover it, at this time,the number should change somehow.
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 17:57, Tuesday 31 January 2017 (366)Get code to link to this report
Comment to More details of locking (Click here to view original report: 365)
Attchment
Images attached to this comment
366_20170131095706_p1310225.jpg 366_20170131095722_loop.png
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 17:56, Tuesday 31 January 2017 (365)Get code to link to this report
More details of locking

In the first picture, I showed the component on the optical bench now, and the red line represents the infrared and green line for green. As it shows in the picture, the transmit beam of the cavity divided by the BS mirror, the reflection part goes into the PD and the transmission part goes into the CCD, so I can see the shape of the beam through the screen connect to it.

And the second picture shows the loop I used to lock the cavity,the red line stands for the beam, I only list the optical component which connected to this loop. The black lines and the orange lines show the wire, but the wires in orange only used for the first step.

As I mentioned in my last report, the Function Generator on the left provides a 15.2MHz sin wave, which is sent to EOM to do the modulation, and also there is the other line come out from this, goes into the 'LO'(Local Oscillate) port of the demodulation board.

Then from the output of PD also goes to two different ways, one goes to the 'RF'( radio frequency) port of the demodulation board and the other goes to the channel 1 of the oscilloscope which shows in yellow on the screen of it.

The signal of 'RF' and 'LO' mixed together in the demodulation board and the output of it will go through the low pass filter of the board and then connected to the channel 2 of the oscilloscope, it shows the error signal and it is blue.

At the first beginning, I used the Function Generator on the right to send a triangle wave to the PZT driver to scan it and find the mode matching. Then when I got the error signal(the output of the demodulation board), firstly, this signal was sent to Stanford who acts as a low pass filter and then the output of Stanford goes to the PZT driver also.Now the loop has been closed.

And then I stopped scanning the cavity(plug out the orange lines), but just change the voltage of the PZT driver by myself. Until from the CCD screen, I am around the maximum of the TEM00 modes. Then I checked, the cavity is locked and the green beam is very powerful.

That's how I did until now, but actually the lock can not keep for very long, only last about 20-30 mins. So since I cannot switch off the loop(there is no switch I can use), I just need to plug out one off the wire and change the voltage of the PZT driver near the resonance and recover the loop. Try to do it this way and find out if I can get better result or not.
Comments related to this report
YuefanGuo - 17:57, Tuesday 31 January 2017 (366)
Attchment
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 20:16, Monday 30 January 2017 (363)Get code to link to this report
Comment to SHG cavity locked (Click here to view original report: 362)
Add the picture, yellow is from the PD and the blue one is the error signal.
Images attached to this comment
363_20170130121627_561525342425498646.jpg
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 20:10, Monday 30 January 2017 (362)Get code to link to this report
SHG cavity locked
Today we found out the reason why there is some flat part in the spectrum, it is because the PZT driver reached its limitation, so we reduced the offset of the PZT driver and got a normal spectrum. Then except the TEM00(the highest peak) we found a vertical first-order mode and a laguerre mode which can not be killed together. So we chose to reduce the TEM01 as lower as possible and keep the laguerre mode and try to lock the cavity.
Before start to lock the cavity, I set the temperature to the phase matching temperature which we found quiet a while ago. The readjust the mirror a little to bit to get the best mode matching I can. Then I set the the sinusoidal wave with frequency of 15.2MHz and amplitude of 400mV, sent it to the EOM to do the modulation,and this is also used to be the 'LO' signal in the demodulation process. Then used the PD to get the transmitted beam of the cavity, which is the 'RF' signal of the demodulation. Then with the demodulation board, the 'LO' and 'RF' signal mixed together, the output( error signal ) sent to the oscilloscope.Also the error signal will go through the low pass filter and send to the input of the PZT driver. The other part of the PZT input is a triangle signal(parameter: 28Hz, amplitude: 2.5V, offset:2.5V) As soon as I got the error signal I stopped scan the cavity with triangle wave and adjust the PZT by changing the offset of PZT driver until the cavity is locked. After the cavity locked, the green light become much more powerful, and the reflection of the green light goes back into the Faraday Isolator, and the reflection from the Faraday point to the height around people's eyes which is really dangerous.
Comments related to this report
YuefanGuo - 20:16, Monday 30 January 2017 (363)
Add the picture, yellow is from the PD and the blue one is the error signal.
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
ManuelMarchio - 21:17, Friday 27 January 2017 (361)Get code to link to this report
Optical Table move

I temporarily moved another optical table inside the clean booth because I need some extra space in a clean environment to test the new assembly of the translation stage.

Images attached to this report
361_20170127131742_tablemoved.jpg
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 19:28, Wednesday 25 January 2017 (360)Get code to link to this report
TEM00 and the space for new laser
Yesterday I finished the alignment. Today when we tried to clean up the central room, found the beam splitter in one box, so I divided the transmitted beam from the cavity into two part, one received by the PD to see the spectrum and the other received by the camera to see the mode shape. For now from the first picture, the highest peak is the TEM00. But the problem is the height of the peak is very sensitive. I connected the cavity to the thermal control to stabilize to some extent, but if I touch the table or the mirror, it changed a lot. And it seems also a slow change with time exist.
Today we clean up the unused part of the optical bench for the two lasers, and we found a rack for the power supply. The arrangement shows in the second picture.
Images attached to this report
360_20170125112000_114423639463415553.jpg 360_20170125112010_733924771718095036.jpg
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
ManuelMarchio - 19:19, Wednesday 25 January 2017 (359)Get code to link to this report
New parts for the translation stage

In order to decrease the height of the sample on the translation stage, I designed a new configuration of the assembly of the translation stage and some new parts. With the help of Hirata san, I made these drawings and submitted at the mechanical shop of ATC.

Non-image files attached to this report
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 19:58, Monday 23 January 2017 (358)Get code to link to this report
Progress of Jan 20th,23rd
I tried to increase the height of the beam, but every time I increased beam height, it was far more than I need. Finally I found out the difference of the beam height and the height of the cavity is very tiny, before the beam is lower is because a pretty slow reduction of the beam height. So I adjusted the beam path again and made the beam goes into the cavity from the center in vertical way, but this time the situation went back to before, there were two beams in the horizontal direction, but it seems better since there are not very strange behavior of the two beams, and I can see the mode is exactly some higher mode. The alignment will kept doing tomorrow.
General (General)
Print this report.
ManuelMarchio - 19:38, Thursday 19 January 2017 (357)Get code to link to this report
Clean up some multiple sockets

I tidied up the power supply of the absorption measurement system because it was too messy. There were a lot of unnecessary multiple sockets connected in series (which is bad for the electrical grounding), especially under the stairs (all covered by dust). So, I rearranged the multiple sockets and put the unneeded ones on a shelf in the first floor, see the picture.

Images attached to this report
357_20170119113726_sockets.png
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 16:47, Thursday 19 January 2017 (356)Get code to link to this report
Try to adjust the beam height
I rotated the dichroic mirror in order not to block the green beam for next step. For easy understanding, the first picture shows how I did the rotation. Before I did the rotation, we tried for very long time to do the mode matching, but there are always two beams, and no matter how we changed the two mirrors and the position of the cavity, it did not get better, and the misalignment seems in the horizontal direction. But after I rotated the dichroic mirror for 90 degree, which I think will not effect the transmitted beam, the mode I saw now are all vertical modes. I found a mode with round shape which is likely to be the TEM00, but I am not pretty sure that is the real fundamental mode or just some coincidence that the two beams overlap.I found its peak from the spectrum, and tried to make it larger with adjustment of the two mirrors, but it did not have an obvious change. For now the misalignment is in the vertical direction and it is true that now the beam is a little bit lower than the cavity, it maybe better to higher the beam, since we have four mirrors before the cavity, it seems not very hard to higher the beam and recover it parallel to the table. Then I will check again if I got the TEM00.
Images attached to this report
356_20170119084525_change.png
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 21:31, Tuesday 17 January 2017 (355)Get code to link to this report
Progress of 16th and 17th
We found out the beam we are looking at is not clear enough, it will be harder to do the alignment with that, so I adjusted the camera and also the beam path. From the first picture, it is the beam path that if we want to look at the beam directly with CCD, I lower the camera instead of bending the holder which will make the situation more complicated. The second picture shows what we have now with CCD. It seems the higher order beam is in horizontal direction but the mode is a liitle bit strange. And before if we use the camera with the camera lens, and use the camera to look at the card, the beam is quiet small. So I changed the lens to make the beam larger and have more details of the beam. But then I found out that instead one beam, there were two separate spots on the card.( I didn't get very good picture to show this.) And first I thought it may be the TEM01 mode, but if it is, the pattern should be like one round spot cutting into two, but what I saw it two round spots and there is some distance between them. The other guess is that it is the reflection in the cavity, which means that the beam path inside the cavity is not overlap with the line between the center of miniscope and crystal.But when I drove the PZT, the distance between the two spot seems not change. So I am not sure where the two spots came from.
Images attached to this report
355_20170117131927_p1160200.jpg 355_20170117131946_p1160194.jpg
R&D (General)
Print this report.
YuefanGuo - 20:04, Saturday 14 January 2017 (354)Get code to link to this report
Alignment of the SHG
I did the alignment SHG cavity for some days. For now, the first picture in the attachment shows the spectrum from the PD. At the beginning, the mode I got are all Laguerre modes. So I moved the position of the cavity to get better waist position matching. After that, I removed the mirror, let the transmitted beam from the cavity go directly to the CCD, in the second picture shows the situation of the optical bench now. Then from the screen that connected to the screen, I got the mode visually. Since the height of the camera mount is too high, so I bend the holder for 90 degree, so from the third picture although it seems like the misalignment is in the vertical direction, actually it is in the horizontal direction. The third picture only shows one of the mode I saw, but the others are all like this, and there are also some others too weak to see.During the adjustment I did on Friday, with adjusting the two mirror before the cavity in horizontal direction, did not make the situation better. I'll keep trying.
Images attached to this report
354_20170114120209_645646310049050848.jpg 354_20170114120223_291332076514906384.jpg 354_20170114120243_p1130186.jpg
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
ManuelMarchio - 19:23, Friday 13 January 2017 (353)Get code to link to this report
Current version of the VIs to control the large translation stage

I upload the front panels and diagrams of the current version of the VIs and subVIs that I made with the help of Sakai-san.

The main VIs are "Translation Stage Map.vi" and "Translation Stage Scan.vi"

I don't upload the diagrams of subVIs that belong the SR830's and the Zaber motors' libraries.

Non-image files attached to this report