LOG-IN
Displaying reports 1481-1500 of 3047.Go to page Start 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 End
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 11:44, Wednesday 20 November 2019 (1856)Get code to link to this report
Deployment of an additional DAC

[Matteo, Eleonora]

- We added a new DAC module both on the master model (k1x01) and slave model ( k1fds).

- We added a PCiexpresse DAC board to the last slot availabe on the standalone. Now we have 2 ADC and 2 DAC.

- We installed and powered an AI filter in the DGS rack. Only 8 channels are available. (Pic 1).

- We connected the DAC timing box to the DAC baord in the standalone. We could not connect the timing box to the AI filter because we miss the cable. (It will arrive tomorrow from Kamioka).

- We installed and powered a BNC to Dsub converter into the rack in the clean room. (Pic 2).

- We restarted the standalone and the model didn't show any problem.

We will test the signal from the new DAC as soon as we receve the missing cable.

Images attached to this report
1856_20191120033651_pic1.jpeg 1856_20191120033853_pic2.jpeg
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 10:39, Wednesday 20 November 2019 (1855)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Vacuum test (Click here to view original report: 1849)

I started pumping down this mornig and the pumps were working properly.
It seems that the vacuum gauge has a problem...

Although the pressure seemed decreasing, the pressure showen on the display was 9.8*10-1 Pa.
In addition to that, the output voltage from the ANELVA showed strange behavior.
Therefore I am suspecting the gauge has a problem.

Images attached to this comment
1855_20191120052056_20191120vac.jpg
KAGRA MIR (Absorption)
Print this report.
SimonZeidler - 19:31, Tuesday 19 November 2019 (1854)Get code to link to this report
Absorption-confirmation of Shinkosha#7 sample

Pengbo, Simon

On Friday (Nov. 15th) we reset the PCI system to do absorption measurements. The main purpose was basically to confirm the absorption maps with those Manuel measured before and to see whether the birefringence maps really do correlate with the absorption patterns.

The results can be seen attached. The map is quite similar to the "center"-map from Manuel and it the similarity of the patterns to the birefringence maps is obvious (elog 1843).

An interesting fact may be that the mean absorption coefficient is 77 ppm/cm which is ~30% smaller than the value Manuel has calculated from his' map. We are quite sure that this is due to the calibration factor we derived before starting the measurement.

Images attached to this report
1854_20191119113150_figure1.png 1854_20191119113155_figure2.png
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 09:28, Tuesday 19 November 2019 (1853)Get code to link to this report
Comment to Vacuum test (Click here to view original report: 1849)

This mornig the pressure was 9.8*10-1 Pa, though it was 5.0*10-3 Pa yesterday...
I am suspecting the residual water caused the problem.

I took a data during thus vacuum test.
The measured output voltage from ANELVA M-601GC has a relationship between the pressure which is described as

P = 102*V-12,

where P is the pressure and V is the output voltage.
I roughly checked the pressure using this relation and it was like 10-6 Pa, though the displayed pressure was ~10-3 Pa.
The output voltage was not correct for some reason,

I will check the measured voltage and do the test again without venting.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 09:15, Tuesday 19 November 2019 (1852)Get code to link to this report
Time-out error on diaggui: DGS restarted

Yesterday I found a timed-out error on diaggui. DGS was restarted to reset timing syncronization 

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
EleonoraCapocasa - 09:10, Tuesday 19 November 2019 (1851)Get code to link to this report
BS spectra shows higher broadband noise

Yesterday, while testing an improveed filter for BS optical lever control, I found that, after closing the loop, there was an increese of the noise level in the spectrum (as I already observed in entry 1642), the level stayed high also after I open the loop and reset the filter. It went back to normal after I switch on and off the coildriver, but it got high again if I close the loop ( no matter whcih filter I use)

Pic1:  blue curve open loop spectra before with normal noise level (YAW top/PIT bottom). Red curve closed loop spectra with increased noise.

Images attached to this report
1851_20191119011024_bshighnose.png
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 18:05, Monday 18 November 2019 (1850)Get code to link to this report
Double-pass AOM installation

I installed the another double-pass AOM — to be precise, I installed a lens, QWP, and mirror for composing double-pass AOM system.
The attached picture shows the installed optics.
The following is the procedure.

  1. Adjusted the alignment to maximize the -1st order diffracted beam power.
    The diffraction efficiency was about 85%.
  2. Then put a lens (f=75mm) and QWP to collimate the beam.
  3. Put a mirror and adjusted the alignment to let the diffracted beam enter the AOM.
  4. Adjusted the alignment with two STMs and one end mirror by monitoring double-passed beam power.
  5. I got about 72% double-pass diffraction efficiency at the end.

I have not investigated the beam jitter of this system.
So I gonna measure the beam jitter with frequency scan and then install optics for ISS.

Images attached to this report
1850_20191118095345_20191118aom.jpg
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 17:50, Monday 18 November 2019 (1849)Get code to link to this report
Vacuum test

Today I restarted pumping down.
I turned on the scroll pump at 15:40 and waited until the pressure level became less than 10 Pa.
Then I turned on the turbo pump at 16:00 and the pressure is getting lower.

I will leave them running until tomorrow morning.

Comments related to this report
SatoshiTanioka - 09:28, Tuesday 19 November 2019 (1853)

This mornig the pressure was 9.8*10-1 Pa, though it was 5.0*10-3 Pa yesterday...
I am suspecting the residual water caused the problem.

I took a data during thus vacuum test.
The measured output voltage from ANELVA M-601GC has a relationship between the pressure which is described as

P = 102*V-12,

where P is the pressure and V is the output voltage.
I roughly checked the pressure using this relation and it was like 10-6 Pa, though the displayed pressure was ~10-3 Pa.
The output voltage was not correct for some reason,

I will check the measured voltage and do the test again without venting.

SatoshiTanioka - 10:39, Wednesday 20 November 2019 (1855)

I started pumping down this mornig and the pumps were working properly.
It seems that the vacuum gauge has a problem...

Although the pressure seemed decreasing, the pressure showen on the display was 9.8*10-1 Pa.
In addition to that, the output voltage from the ANELVA showed strange behavior.
Therefore I am suspecting the gauge has a problem.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 13:59, Monday 18 November 2019 (1840)Get code to link to this report
Beam jitter reduction

I measured the beam jitter induced by AOM frequency scan by using beam profiler.
I set the requirement of beam jitter as 0.05mrad/MHz .
This value corresponds to 0.1mm shift at folded cavity input mirror though there exists 1MHz frequency shift (I assumed that the distance from AOM to folded cavity is 2m).
This beam jitter is small enough from the view point of alignment during the DC locking.

The measured beam shifts at 0.5m distance from the AOM was about 0.2mm with 15MHz frequency shift.
So the beam jitter is about 30urad/MHz with current configuration.
This seems small enough for the moment.

The next step is implement another double-pass AOM and measure the beam jitter.
Then construct ISS using AOMs.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 01:36, Saturday 16 November 2019 (1848)Get code to link to this report
ModeMismatch between OPO_tra and local oscillator

Yaochin, Yuhang

In the attached file, I calculated the loss comes from a spatial mismatch between OPO and IRMC. The calculation is revised by following Eleonora's suggestion. The result shows a loss of 0.000014% from this issue.

Non-image files attached to this report
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 17:40, Friday 15 November 2019 (1847)Get code to link to this report
Double-pass AOM efficiency improvement

I tried to improve the efficiency of double-pass AOM.
Before this work, the efficiency was about 65%.

Today, I modified the position of the mirror which is used to re-inject the beam to the AOM.
Now, the mirror is located closer position to the AOM than before.
After that, the double-pass efficiency became about 72% which is satisfactory value.

So I will tackle on the beam jitter measurement.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 17:23, Friday 15 November 2019 (1846)Get code to link to this report
Comment to 2nd Vacuum Test (Click here to view original report: 1845)

I stopped the pumps around 16:00.
At that time, the pressure was 1.9*10-3 Pa.

After stopping the pumps, the pressure level increased gradually.
In this time, I did not record the pressure.
I wiil do the vacuum test one more time and take the data.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 10:42, Friday 15 November 2019 (1845)Get code to link to this report
2nd Vacuum Test

[Takahashi-san, Tanioka]

Takahashi-san kindly installed the another roughing pump yesterday.
We turned it on this morning.
After several minutes, the pressure became below 10 Pa.
Then we turned on the turbo pump.
Now the two pumps are working and I plan to leave the pumps running for a while.

Comments related to this report
SatoshiTanioka - 17:23, Friday 15 November 2019 (1846)

I stopped the pumps around 16:00.
At that time, the pressure was 1.9*10-3 Pa.

After stopping the pumps, the pressure level increased gradually.
In this time, I did not record the pressure.
I wiil do the vacuum test one more time and take the data.

R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
YuhangZhao - 21:50, Thursday 14 November 2019 (1844)Get code to link to this report
Check of OPO transmission by using camera

Aritomi, Yaochin, and Yuhang

Since we found there may be an issue of scattering from OPO(entry 1842), we did this check.

From the thesis of Emil,  they had 8% of power loss due to the higher-order modes from the damaged OPO. If we have the same situation with GEO600, we should have the problem reported in entry 1842. At a farther distance, the measurement of power will go down since the higher-order modes are much larger than TEM00. An easy check to tell if we have the same problem is to check OPO transmission by the camera.

We checked two positions, one is just after the dichroic mirror. Another is at some distance after the new Faraday isolator. They give almost the same result. However, as shown in the attached figures(the first is a picture taken by the camera by using the OD5 filter, the second is a picture taken by the camera by using the OD3 filter). OPO transmission doesn't have a special problem. (There are some points in the photo, the reason to have this is still unknown)

Images attached to this report
1844_20191114134900_wechatimg594.jpeg 1844_20191114134905_wechatimg595.jpeg
KAGRA MIR (Polarization)
Print this report.
PengboLi - 10:23, Thursday 14 November 2019 (1843)Get code to link to this report
Polarization characterization of the KAGRA-size Shinkosha sample #7

Simon, Pengbo

This week we finished the characterization of the KAGRA-size Shinkosha sample #7.  We did several polarization maps with different incident polarization angles.( 0 degrees represents the pure p polarization)

As can be seen, both S- and P- polarization maps show an apparent offset, which is reasonable due to the birefringence effect. And the other three mixtured maps are well-matched with the incident polarization angles.

Noted that, each time when I adjusted the polarization, the DC signal keeps a relatively stable state but the AC signal seems very unstable, either goes up or goes down for a long time. 

Images attached to this report
1843_20191114021027_figurep1.png 1843_20191114021032_figures1.png 1843_20191114021036_figuresp111.png 1843_20191114021040_figuresp131.png 1843_20191114021043_figuresp311.png 1843_20191114021047_figurep2.png 1843_20191114021054_figures2.png 1843_20191114021057_figuresp112.png 1843_20191114021101_figuresp132.png 1843_20191114021106_figuresp312.png
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 23:38, Wednesday 13 November 2019 (1842)Get code to link to this report
Investigation of dichroic mirror

[Aritomi, Yaochin, Yuhang]

Yesterday we found that loss from dichroic mirror is 6.7%, so we investigated loss of dichroic mirror. We used two dichroic mirrors: one is HBSY11 from thorlabs which we are using and another one is from newport.

We measured BAB transmission of dichroic mirror and tried to minimize it. To remove green generated by BAB inside OPO, we put OPO temperature in the region with no parametric gain. This time we set 9.36kOhm of OPO temperature. We tweaked angle of dichroic mirrors a lot, but reflection power almost didn't change. By looking at transmission of dichroic mirror, we somehow found the minimum point and measured loss. We measured BAB power in two ways: one is to scan OPO and measure the BAB peak height, another one is to lock OPO by hand. For both cases, we had still ~3% loss from dichroic mirrors.

To characterize HBSY11, we checked reflectivity of HBSY11 with LO. We measured reflection from HBSY11 with power meter and PD. The result is as follows. Reflection power with power meter didn't depend on angle of HBSY11, but reflection power with PD changed from 380mV to 392mV by tweaking angle. Note that distance between HBSY11 and PD is 4cm.

power meter
injection 129 mV
reflection 128 mV
reflectivity 99.2%

PD
injection 384 mV
reflection 380 - 392 mV
reflectivity 99 - 102 % 
 

For both cases, reflectivity of HBSY11 is consistent with specification which is 99.3%. From these results, we concluded that dichroic mirror (HBSY11) is fine.

Then we put HBSY11 back to after OPO and measured reflection and transmission of HBSY11 at the same time. The result is as follows and shown in Pic.1. The sum of reflection and transmission doesn't match with injection just after OPO.

injection (just after OPO) 429 uW
reflection 408 uW
transmission 0.14 uW
injection (after removing dichroic mirror) 399 uW

We thought some scattering light comes from OPO and the scattering light is also measured just after OPO. So we removed dichroic mirror and measured OPO transmission at further point to remove the scattering as shown in Pic.2. BAB transmission after removing dichroic mirror is 399uW. BAB transmission is lost by 7% between two points. The loss seems scattering from OPO, but we are not sure the reason. Yuhang will check if the aperture of power meter is large enough.

Conclusion: Dichroic mirror is fine. Loss is coming from OPO transmission.

Images attached to this report
1842_20191113153825_img8001.jpg 1842_20191113153831_scattering.jpg
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 22:15, Wednesday 13 November 2019 (1841)Get code to link to this report
Something happened on scroll pump

[Takahashi-san, Tanioka]

We did vacuum test of cryostat at ATC using scroll pump and turbo pump.
The procedure was as follows:

  1. Close the chamber (without 4K shield temporary).
  2. Confirmed all the valve were closed and turned on the scroll pump.
  3. Opened the valve.
  4. Then the pressure level was down to 3.0*10 Pa.
    However, it increased and reached about 5.5*10 Pa.
    This was due to the residual water molecules inside the chamber and it was solved by opening gas ballast of scroll pump.
  5. After some iterations, the pressure level reached about 10 Pa.
    We turned on the turbo pump and the pressure level decreased less than 10^-1 Pa.

So it seems that there is no huge leakage, which was good thing.
However, after a few minutes turbo pump run, the scroll pump was turned off for some reasons.
Unfortunately I could not see what happened since I went to bathroom.
We tried to recover, but the scroll pump did not work even the power indicator did not iluminate...
One possibility is that fuse blown.
We will investigate.

Images attached to this report
1841_20191113140911_20191113turbo.jpg 1841_20191113140915_20191113pressure.jpg
R&D (FilterCavity)
Print this report.
NaokiAritomi - 21:34, Tuesday 12 November 2019 (1839)Get code to link to this report
Loss investigation

[Aritomi, Yaochin]

First we checked visibility. Visibility is 98.2% and loss from visibility is 3.5% as follows. This is a bit worse than before and we should improve mode matching of BAB.

maximum 648 mV
minimum 120 mV
LO 336 mV
BAB 64 mV
offset 6.4 mV
visibility 98.2%
visibility^2 96.5%

Then we found that loss from dichroic mirror is 6.7% and loss from PBS is 2.1% as follows. It's strange that loss from dichroic mirror is so large.

before dichroic mirror 464 uW
after dichroic mirror 433 uW 

before PBS 331 uW
after PBS 324 uW

Tomorrow we'll align dichroic mirror and replace PBS with HR mirror. The method to align dichroic mirror is to send only BAB to scanned OPO and put HR mirror just after dichroic mirror and maximize the reflection.

R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 19:35, Tuesday 12 November 2019 (1838)Get code to link to this report
Double-pass AOM construction

I installed the another AOM as attached picture as following procedure.

  1. Put a PBS and adjusted its angle.
  2. Put an AOM and connected to a driver.
  3. Drove the AOM and played with STMs to increase the diffracted beam power.

Current diffraction efficiency is about 80% and still there is a room for improvement.

In addition, I worked on the double-pass AOM alignment previously installed.

  1. Put a lens (f=75mm) after the AOM to collimate the beam.
  2. Put a mirror and PBS to pick up the double-passed beam.
  3. Adjusted the alignment and lens' position.

The power of double-passed beam is 5.76mW in contrast with 8.86mW input to AOM.
Hence the double-pass diffraction efficiency is about 65% which is reasonable value.

The next step is (quantitatively) measure the beam jitter with scanning frequency and minimize it.

Images attached to this report
1838_20191112113138_20191112aom.jpg
R&D (Cryogenic)
Print this report.
SatoshiTanioka - 16:09, Tuesday 12 November 2019 (1832)Get code to link to this report
Folded Cavity Spacer

I ordered a folded cavity spacer and related parts from NAKAO SEIKI.
They will be made of invar (IC-DX) which can be used under cryogenic temperature.
The drawings are uploaded on Wiki page (explanation are written in Japanese though) (https://gwpo.nao.ac.jp/wiki/CryogenicThermal/ActivityNAOJ/Spacer).