R&D (FilterCavity)
NaokiAritomi - 14:25, Tuesday 28 July 2020 (2127)
Sensing matrix of input mirror for WFS1

[Aritomi, Yuhang]

We measured sensing matrix of WFS1. We injected a line to pitch and yaw of input mirror. The frequency of the injected line was 12 Hz and the amplitude was 2000. Then we measured WFS1_PIT and WFS1_YAW signal.

First we injected a line to pitch of input mirror and measured 12 Hz peak of WFS1_I_PIT and WFS1_I_YAW with demodulation phase R = 90 deg. With R = 90 deg, WFS1_I and WFS1_Q signals were almost the same. The measured 12 Hz peak is as follows.

WFS1_I_PIT 0.25
WFS1_I_YAW 0.038

This means we have about 10% coupling from pitch to yaw of input mirror. This may be due to coupling of coil-magnet actuator driving.

Then we optimized the demodulation phase R in order to maximize WFS1_Q_PIT signal. The optimal demodulation phase for WFS1_Q_PIT was R = 20 deg. After that we injected the same line to yaw of input mirror and measured WFS1_I_YAW and WFS1_Q_YAW. Measured sensing matrix of WFS1 for pitch and yaw with demodulation phase R = 20 deg is as follows. Screenshots of the 12 Hz peak for PIT and YAW are also attached.

  I phase Q phase
WFS1_PIT 0 0.48
WFS1_YAW 0.07 0.47

The optimal demodulation phase R = 20 deg for pitch was not exactly optimal for yaw, but it seems we can use WFS1 Q phase signal for both pitch and yaw.

We'll replace galvo servo for QPD2 and measure sensing matrix of WFS2.

Images attached to this report
2127_20200728072635_2020727wfs1pit.png 2127_20200728072643_2020727wfs1yaw.png